Erieblogging: Day Five
Erieblogging: Day Seven

Erieblogging: Day Six

I’m posting an un- or underexplored question about Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins every day this month (parallel posted on Prawfsblawg).
 
Today's question: Owing to Louisiana’s civil law tradition, the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decisions concerning Louisiana statutes are not binding upon lower Louisiana courts, except in the particular case in which the decision was made. And yet federal courts interpreting Louisiana statutes follow the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decisions and, when the matter is unsettled, attempt to predict how it would resolve the matter. Are they showing insufficient sensitivity to Louisiana's unique legal heritage?

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)