Essay Question 5 from the 2012 CivPro Exam
Essay Question 7 from the 2012 CivPro Exam

Erieblogging: Day Four

I’m posting an un- or underexplored question about Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins every day this month.
Today's question: Assume that the correct reading of Brandeis’s opinion in Erie is that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decisions concerning Pennsylvania common law are binding on a federal court to the extent that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court wants them to be binding. How do we know what the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's views on the matter are? Unless the question is certified, when would the issue ever come up before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court (or any other Pennsylvania state court)?  My answer? Never.

Does this explain why the disagreement between advocates of Swift and Erie was so intractable? It was about state law (namely whether a state supreme court’s decisions were intended to bind federal courts) but the state supreme court never had occasion to resolve it?

(Note: This is parallel posted on Prawfsblawg.)


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)